Why the Upper Peninsula is Not Part of Wisconsin
The Upper Peninsula seems to be mystery to much of the U.S. population outside of the Midwest, and even to some of those in the Midwest. It’s quite common to think that the Upper Peninsula is part of Canada and sometimes even textbooks don’t know what state the Upper Peninsula is in. More than anything, most people assume that the Upper Peninsula is part of Wisconsin.
A sample of search engine keywords to Yooper Steez:
It’s a fair question to ask. After all, the Upper Peninsula at no point touches the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. Wisconsin is the only section of land shared between the Upper Peninsula, everywhere else is bordered by water.
The Toledo War
During the early 1800s there was a conflict between Michigan and Ohio (and I don’t mean a football rivalry). At the time Ohio had already been admitted into the union while Michigan was still a territory.
The dispute during the Toledo War (also known as the Ohio-Michigan War) began with different interpretations of the geographic boundaries and features between the State of Ohio and the Michigan Territory. Both governments were claiming sovereignty over a 468 square mile region, which became known as the Toledo Strip.
Until the year 1818, the Michigan Territory had ownership over the eastern section of the Upper Peninsula (the yellow region in the graphic above). The territory then expanded to include the rest of the Upper Peninsula, the entire State of Wisconsin and other parts of the Midwest.
Due to a financial crisis the Michigan Territory was under pressure from Congress and President Andrew Jackson, at which point the Michigan Territory accepted a resolution from the government.
173 Years Ago
On June 15, 1836, President Andrew Jackson signed a bill that first recognized Michigan as a state. However, Michigan would have to concede the Toledo Strip to Ohio, but was given the western three quarters of the Upper Peninsula in return (most of which borders Wisconsin along the Menominee River).
At first, Michigan rejected the offer partly out of pride and feeling that the Upper Peninsula was a worthless region. As their financial crisis lingered on they would have been left out of surplus government money if they had remained a territory rather than a state. Michigan accepted the terms in December in Ann Arbor.
When the Toledo War ended it was considered that Ohio had “won”. This belief changed in the 1840s when it was discovered that the Upper Peninsula was a vast region of resources including copper and iron ore. Considered to have produced more mineral wealth than the California Gold Rush, the Upper Peninsula supplied 90% of the United States copper supply by the 1860s and was the largest supplier of iron ore by the 1890s.
Had Michigan won the Toledo War they would have acquire the Toledo Strip, meaning that the Upper Peninsula probably would have become a part of the Wisconsin Territory and later a part of the State of Wisconsin.
Michigan was finally admitted into the Union on January 26, 1837 as the 26th state with the Upper Peninsula included.
……
Quite frankly, I’m pretty stoked that Michigan has the 16,452 square mile paradise of the Upper Peninsula rather than the 468 square mile region of the Toledo Strip. Clearly I’m biased, but I think we clearly got the better deal.
All you history buffs out there let me know if there is more info I should include.
Jun 15, 2009
…It’s interesting to note… that while the UP still has magnificent beauty and pristine wilderness. The map shown above is still a fairly accurate representation of the the way each region treats the other. “Yoopers”, don’t REALLY consider anyone on the far estern end of the UP “TRUE Yoopers”… … and eastern parts of the UP and LP are more or less ambivalent to each other.
Aug 23, 2009
“Upper Canada”???? Come on now…you know that’s not right. Other than Southern Ontario, the 49th parallel separates the U.S. from the SOUTHERN portions of Canada. I realize the discussion was about folks not realizing that the U.P. is part of Michigan, but label Canada properly please.
Admin
Aug 24, 2009
Duke,
The map above is a historic map from the 1800s. And I too was curious why it said “Upper Canada”.
I found that “Upper Canada” was actually a British Colony between 1791–1841.
You can read more here…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_Canada
Apr 11, 2010
I heard it also had to do with who was a major land owner in the upper peninsula and that he wanted to be part of Michigan. is there any truth to this?
Apr 25, 2010
Glad to have found this. After watching How the States Got Their Shapes on the History Channel, I wanted to verify what I had read long ago. Your explanation is exactly as I remembered it.
It’s been too long since I’ve visited the UP. Spent many years there in college (MTU 1984) and enjoyed every minute.
Apr 26, 2010
ok, there was a “war” between Ohio and Michigan, why did Wisconsin get the shaft? and how were the boundaries of the UP determined? Also since I’ve been living in Alaska, I’ve thought there were similarities to the UP and Alaska, now I’ve discovered one more, Alaska was Seward’s folly and in a since the UP was Jackson’s folly. Unwanted territories of wilderness which later became valuable for natural resources.
Oct 14, 2010
Wisconsin got the shaft because it wasn’t yet a state (like Ohio) or even nearly so (like Michigan).
But as Yoopersteez mentioned in passing, Wisconsin itself used to be a part of Michigan. (2 of our first 6 “organized” counties were in what is now Wisconsin.) It was split off in the statehood drive; presumably because it was ungovernably far away for the transportation then available.
Jun 15, 2012
I’ve heard my mates talk about this so many times in conversations and arguments. All because I now live in Wisconsin but prefer the UP because that’s where I’m from. I mean I could care less because either way I’m still a Yooper through and through no matter what.
Jun 15, 2012
Thanks for the short informative post! Fun to look back and see how my childhood home came to be that part of Michigan that SO many people believe is part of Wisconsin. Good job!
Jun 15, 2012
“Upper Canada” refers to the direction of the flow of water. The Great Lakes are all flow into the St. Lawrence River eventually, but the farthest western parts of the Great Lakes are the most “upstream” part of the system…so they are called “Upper Canada.” Similarly, the southern part of Egypt is called “Upper Egypt” because it is upstream along the Nile, even though geographically it is south of Lower Egypt.
Jul 6, 2012
Fine summary of U.P. founding, but you left out a great resource – Timber covered the U.P. like hair on a dog and created many U.P. communities like Escanaba, Menominee, and oodles of smaller places.
Sep 10, 2012
Upper Can. is the historic name for the region. (Ontario) the other friendly neighbor of the UP besides your friends to the south in Wisco.
It is correctly labeled my friend.
It is a historical map.
Lower Can. became Quebec.
and yes the UP is a little piece of heaven
from a Wisconsinite.
Sep 23, 2012
This article should be labeled “Why the Wisconsin is Not Part of the Upper Peninsula” since Michigan’s unity came first and Wisconsin came second.
Sep 25, 2012
Personally I’d be a lot more stoked if the U.P. were known as Superior, the 51st state.
Dec 11, 2012
In the end, the U.P. got the shaft. It was swallowed up by Detroit. I can only imagine how nice this place would be had there been no Detroit to determine everything politically and finacially for us. I agree with Jim Borst. There is a problem however. If our economy and business environment didn’t include Detroit or Milwaukee, we might be so attractive to those fleeing the surrounding areas that the rustic beauty and solitude we enjoy would be destroyed. It’s probably better that we are economically depressed but blessed in every other way.